<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Perplexity on publishing.co.uk — Professional KDP Book Formatting</title><link>https://publishing.co.uk/tags/perplexity/</link><description>Recent content in Perplexity on publishing.co.uk — Professional KDP Book Formatting</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://publishing.co.uk/tags/perplexity/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>ChatGPT vs Perplexity: Which AI Recommends Books Better?</title><link>https://publishing.co.uk/guides/chatgpt-vs-perplexity-book-recommendations/</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://publishing.co.uk/guides/chatgpt-vs-perplexity-book-recommendations/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Last reviewed by Robert Prime — July 2026&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Readers now ask AI what to read next, and two of the tools they reach for behave very differently under the hood. So which recommends books better — &lt;strong&gt;ChatGPT or Perplexity&lt;/strong&gt;? The honest answer: neither is universally better, because they find and cite books in fundamentally different ways — and the only way to know which one names &lt;em&gt;your&lt;/em&gt; book is to test both.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>